Showing posts with label Sparta. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sparta. Show all posts
Friday, 27 January 2012
Friday, 20 January 2012
At The Drive-In in Retrospect: Hell Paso (1994)
All great bands have to start somewhere and it was this 1994 release that began it all for At The Drive-In. Paid for by guitarist, Jim Ward’s college savings, it shows the band still in its formative stages. Only two members of what is now considered to be the definitive At The Drive-In line-up featured on this EP, those people being guitarist and backing vocalist, Jim Ward, and lead vocalist, Cedric Bixler-Zavala. With a title that reflected their feelings about their home town of El Paso, Texas, Hell Paso was released not long after their first ever show with the music bearing little resemblance to what would come in the later part of the decade. It is, honestly, an average listen notable only for what the band would become.
While the music doesn’t match up to the experimental, boundary pushing that made them popular, it did give the first indication of what would become one of At The Drive-In’s staples; odd song titles. They are titles that give very little indication to the nature of the songs. In a way, At The Drive-In is forcing you to abandon your expectations by giving you very few clues regarding what you might hear. So it might have been a bit of a disappointing listen back in 1994, as it is now, to hear such straightforward music from the three tracks presented here.
The opening track, Grand Mox Turkin, the track with the strangest title, is probably the most “normal” song here. It is two minutes and forty-three seconds of straight up, early 1990s punk. In fact, at times, this track has certain hints of Green Day in it, particularly with the vocal melodies in the chorus. Only at the 1:30 mark does the track provide something unexpected with a chugging, almost trash metal-like riff, but even this is relatively hidden. At The Drive-In hadn’t learned how to explore their diverse influences yet and as such, tend to stick to formulas that they know how to work.
Second track, Red Planet, continues in much the same vein with its predictable pop-punk power chords. Of the three tracks on this EP, this is probably the least interesting. What it does show though, is that even in their early stages, At The Drive-In were capable of recognising and developing a catchy melody when required, something that they almost avoided in later years.
It’s only on the final track, Emptiness Is A Mule, that the listener is given some kind of indication that At The Drive-In has the potential to be something special. The multi-tracked vocals that open the song create an almost swirling effect, disorientating the listener before jumping back into “safer” territory with a standard punk riff. While this introduction is only brief, it does show that there is something different about this band and if they are able to develop it, they just might turn out to be something worthwhile.
Overall, At The Drive-In’s first release, Hell Paso, is fairly amateurish. And so it should be. No band is brilliant from the get go. It takes a lot of time developing a sound and going through different band members before everything clicks and things start happening. So it was for At The Drive-In. Hell Paso, does have fairly poor sound quality, song writing that is not quite developed, and a tendency to try and fit in with what was popular in the punk world at the time. But it does also show the faintest glimmer of potential and just a touch of what was to come.
Next Friday we look at how At The Drive-In developed their sound on their second EP, 1995’s ¡Alfaro Vive, Carajo!. Also, come back tomorrow to get a review of Lamb of God’s new album, Resolution.
Other articles in this series:
The Return of At The Drive-In
Other articles in this series:
The Return of At The Drive-In
Labels:
1994,
2012,
At The Drive-In,
critic,
critique,
Hell Paso,
Jim Ward,
Mars Volta,
music,
return,
reunite,
reviews,
Sparta
Wednesday, 18 January 2012
The Return of At The Drive-In
It seems as though the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival has become the great reviver in rock music. Since its humble beginnings in 1999 the festival has hosted, or played a significant part in, the reunion of many highly influential acts such as Iggy & The Stooges, The Pixies, Rage Against The Machine, The Verve, Pavement and Faith No More. Many of these acts were thought to be dead for good by fans around the world with reunion rumours being limited to barbeque “Wouldn’t it be great if…” conversations. However, Coachella seems to keep pulling off the impossible and this year it appears as though hardcore is the theme with the return of Swedish band Refused (whose The Shape of Punk To Come has to be one of the greatest albums of all time) and one of my personal favourites, and a band that many see as one of the most important of the last 15 years, At The Drive-In.
When I heard the news that the El Paso quintet was coming back, I nearly fell over. Of all the possible reunions of great bands, this was on my “never in a million years” list. The bad blood from their 2001 break-up and the busy schedules they have with their current projects seemed far too much to overcome. But now the impossible has happened and the mighty At The Drive-In have returned, I’m going to take this opportunity to explore what made this band great. Over the coming weeks I will be publishing a series of retrospective reviews, looking back at the band’s recorded history and what each release means to the history of the band and what it might mean now. This will begin on Friday with a look at their 1994 debut release, Hell Paso and then on each Friday following, a release will be explored until we reach their final work, the highly influential Relationship Of Command. But before we do that, I want to take this time to explore the questions that At The Drive-In’s reunion has raised. While their return may be one of the most anticipated music events in 2012, there are many things that fans want to know. What will happen to the new The Mars Volta album and the recently announced Sparta reunion and new album? Is this a one off? Will there be new At The Drive-In music? Why now?
First, let us begin with Omar Rodriguez-Lopez and Cedric Bixler-Zavala’s project, The Mars Volta. Back in August they toured Australia with a set that consisted almost entirely of new songs. The only old, recognisable tracks they played were the final three; Son Et Lumiere/Inertiatic ESP, The Widow and Goliath. The band had described these shows as inviting the audience to a private rehearsal of the new album. As I’ve stated before, these new tracks featured a leaner, more direct sound without the long, jam passages that they had been known for. It was a sound that could only be described as being closer to their At The Drive-In days while still being, very much, The Mars Volta tunes. As per usual with The Mars Volta’s work, this new set of songs had already been recorded and was awaiting a release. The release date kept being pushed back and pushed back and is now slated for March 27 with the title, Noctourniquet. With this new album on the way and The Mars Volta about to go headlong into the promotion of it, questions have arisen regarding the longevity of an At The Drive-In reunion, especially when compounded with the recent announcement that Sparta have ended their hiatus.
Around the same time as The Mars Volta’s Australian tour, Sparta (featuring At The Drive-In members Jim Ward and Tony Hajar) announced that they were ending their three year hiatus and were about to begin playing a run of shows as well as writing and recording an album of new material. Like The Mars Volta, with Sparta back in the studio and about to begin the process of touring and promotion, the At The Drive-In reunion seems to be something that could only ever be a one off performance with serious doubts concerning any new At The Drive-In music any time in the next year or so, if at all.
There is one small theory that appears to be buzzing around the internet though, and it’s that the new The Mars Volta and the new Sparta albums are actually one and the same and is, in fact, a new At The Drive-In album. As unlikely as this sounds (considering The Mars Volta played an entire album’s worth of material back in August that, while leaner and more direct, was still too Mars Volta-esque to be At The Drive-In material) there is plenty of talk about it, both positive and negative. The positive is that any new At The Drive-In music is a good thing and the sooner it comes out, the better. The negatives come mostly from The Mars Volta fans who believe Rodriguez-Lopez and Bixler-Zavala have come too far with their experimental progressive rock sound to go back to their post-hardcore/punk days. The pull in different creative directions that broke the band in the first place would only be amplified by the eleven year gap, and the different creative paths of the band members, since their last show together.
Which brings us to the question everyone’s thinking but dares not ask; are they just doing it for the money? In my opinion, who cares if they are? This is a band that never received the financial rewards they deserved for singlehandedly making punk music relevant again after skate-punk got old and pop-punk became embarrassing. So why not reunite exclusively for a festival, win over some new fans, remind old fans of how good they were/are, gain some publicity and go back to their different bands and use that publicity to promote the new The Mars Volta and Sparta albums, all while cashing a comfortable pay cheque along the way? That doesn’t sound like selling out to me. That sounds like good business thinking.
However, all of this talk and all of these questions seem to be distracting from what is the more pressing issue here, that one of the greatest bands of the late 1990s and early 2000s is back. I feel as though I’ve made it clear that I don’t care how long At The Drive-In stick around for this time. The important thing is that their highly volatile live show will be on display again. Those in attendance at Coachella won’t forget what they see and other bands that consider themselves highly energetic performers will be forced to rethink that assessment. At The Drive-In were never about anything more than unrestrained passion, they didn’t care about anything else other than their music and pushing the boundaries of their capabilities which is more than you can say for the majority of modern performers. And it is this reason that I am glad that At The Drive-In have returned; to teach lessons that some need to learn, and to remind the world of the great band that they were.
So don’t forget to check back on Friday and every Friday following as we journey through At The Drive-In’s recorded history and remind ourselves of what, exactly, the world will be in for on April 15 and 22 and why the hype surrounding their return is justified. As for the other reuniting band at Coachella, Sweden’s Refused, stay tuned for a retrospective review of their seminal The Shape Of Punk To Come sometime before the festival. I feel as though I am doing them a disservice by only looking at one of their albums, but I am new to their music so any look back on their career would just be amateurish in my hands, so I will leave that to someone who is more qualified. As always, thank you for reading and I hope you check back on Friday.
Labels:
2012,
At The Drive-In,
Coachella,
critic,
critique,
Jim Ward,
Mars Volta,
music,
return,
reunite,
reviews,
Sparta
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)